<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SeeIT Consult &#187; web site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.seeit.org/tag/web-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.seeit.org</link>
	<description>Web Programming &#038; IT Consultancy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 10:35:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Choosing a VPS Web Hosting Provider</title>
		<link>http://blog.seeit.org/2010/09/choosing-a-vps-web-hosting-provider/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.seeit.org/2010/09/choosing-a-vps-web-hosting-provider/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web site]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.seeit.org/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You would think that many of your worries are reduced when you move from shared web hosting to a virtual private server (VPS) but as my experiences testify, there is are some pretty frightening stories out there.
I have dealt with 3 VPS providers in the past year and this post goes through some of my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.seeit.org/2010/09/choosing-a-vps-web-hosting-provider/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PHP: The include() include_once() performance debate</title>
		<link>http://blog.seeit.org/2010/06/php-the-include-include_once-performance-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.seeit.org/2010/06/php-the-include-include_once-performance-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[php]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web site]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.seeit.org/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Updated with more tests on 2010-05-16.
Click here to jump to the 2010-05-16 update&#8230;
The conventional wisdom always said that PHP&#8217;s include()/require() was quicker than include_once()/require_once(), but recently I came across an interesting post by Arin Sarkissian which suggests otherwise.  Also I found more commentary on the performance benefit of using relative versus absolute paths in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.seeit.org/2010/06/php-the-include-include_once-performance-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware: ISP&#8217;s as Hosting Companies &#8211; watch your DNS</title>
		<link>http://blog.seeit.org/2010/05/beware-isp-hosting-companies-watch-your-dns/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.seeit.org/2010/05/beware-isp-hosting-companies-watch-your-dns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web site]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.seeit.org/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The symptom
You cease your contract with your hosting company, cancel your contract and move your web site. People start to complain that they cannot reach your web site. Nothing seems out of order.
The problem:
You were hosting with a major ISP (like Eircom, Magnet or BT Ireland). They put DNS entries into their servers for your [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.seeit.org/2010/05/beware-isp-hosting-companies-watch-your-dns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PHP Parse error:  syntax error, unexpected T_STRING in /whatever/my-php-class.php.html on line 1 with PhpDocumentor files on CentOS</title>
		<link>http://blog.seeit.org/2010/04/php-parse-error-syntax-error-unexpected-t_string-in-whatevermy-php-class-php-html-on-line-1-with-phpdocumentor-files-on-centos/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.seeit.org/2010/04/php-parse-error-syntax-error-unexpected-t_string-in-whatevermy-php-class-php-html-on-line-1-with-phpdocumentor-files-on-centos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htaccess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[php]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web site]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-tech-blog.crossen.org/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Symptom:

An XML file saved as something.php.html
Apache was trying to parse it as PHP and throwing an error because Short_open_tag was &#8216;on&#8217;

Fix:
Add the following to an .htaccess file in the folder (or a parent folder):

php_value short_open_tag off

I don&#8217;t know if this is a &#8216;bug&#8217; or a &#8216;feature&#8217;. I don&#8217;t see why Apache should be interpreting *.php.html [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.seeit.org/2010/04/php-parse-error-syntax-error-unexpected-t_string-in-whatevermy-php-class-php-html-on-line-1-with-phpdocumentor-files-on-centos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unlimited Google Adwords for a Fixed Fee &#8211; Not!</title>
		<link>http://blog.seeit.org/2010/03/unlimited-google-adwords-for-a-fixed-fee-not/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.seeit.org/2010/03/unlimited-google-adwords-for-a-fixed-fee-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snake oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web site]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.seeit.org/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A client was approached the other day with an offer that sounds too good to be true. Well guess what, it is!
For more information, Webphoria (a UK web development company) has the story of the AdWords scam, and James from Online Media Direct checked it out the story with Google.
If you are approached with such [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.seeit.org/2010/03/unlimited-google-adwords-for-a-fixed-fee-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 5/13 queries in 0.002 seconds using apc

Served from: blog.seeit.org @ 2012-02-05 03:19:42 -->
